|
Post by RobinBland on Mar 11, 2024 16:29:54 GMT
...Explains Terry Matalas, helpfully. A lot of what he's talking about - "exposition dumps" - "nobody cares" - is just bad writing. Explanations and exposition are supposed to be seeded throughout drama, so the audience doesn't notice them. There are ways of making it work. Or at least, the situ he is describing, is something that needs to be attended to by a script editor - or, at the very least - an exec. Which was his job. To be fair, it's true they had to contend with Covid and all the new rules of production after the pandemic, and the lack of time was a huge problem. But wow, we have here an explanation for why S2 was as woefully shoddy as it was, with all those different, undercooked ideas never coming to fruition. I still haven't been able to go back and watch S3, which I thought was also awful and for the same reasons, but I was outvoted by an overwhelming wave of collective fan nostalgia which seems to think it was one of the best seasons of Trek ever. But there it is, for all to see. They really, really needed a good script doctor. Maybe some of the fan service that stands in for actual character evolution and drama would still have got through, but I can't help thinking it's possible they might've been talked out of some of the lamer ideas.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 11, 2024 20:04:11 GMT
...Explains Terry Matalas, helpfully. A lot of what he's talking about - "exposition dumps" - "nobody cares" - is just bad writing. Explanations and exposition are supposed to be seeded throughout drama, so the audience doesn't notice them. There are ways of making it work. Or at least, the situ he is describing, is something that needs to be attended to by a script editor - or, at the very least - an exec. Which was his job. To be fair, it's true they had to contend with Covid and all the new rules of production after the pandemic, and the lack of time was a huge problem. But wow, we have here an explanation for why S2 was as woefully shoddy as it was, with all those different, undercooked ideas never coming to fruition. I still haven't been able to go back and watch S3, which I thought was also awful and for the same reasons, but I was outvoted by an overwhelming wave of collective fan nostalgia which seems to think it was one of the best seasons of Trek ever. But there it is, for all to see. They really, really needed a good script doctor. Maybe some of the fan service that stands in for actual character evolution and drama would still have got through, but I can't help thinking it's possible they might've been talked out of some of the lamer ideas. It's all a mess. I mean, I can give S2 a pass to some degree because COVID kinda upended everything and everyone, but I don't think that quite excuses S3. There are two glaring problems with it in my view: the syrupy bath in nostalgia is one. I don't think a script doctor would have helped that as much as one would like because I think it was a conscious choice. This is the last hurrah and we want to tug at all the heartstrings possible, and I don't think that was a choice made to gloss over story issues. This is where Matalas is honestly too much of a fan to be the one to do it. The other problem is the Shrike and Vadic. This threads through 80% of the season, and it's nothing. It's literally nothing to the story. How do you not read that and, "Why does she need to be here? Why is she here sucking up time only to just be done in Ep8 and absolutely none of it matters?" The answer is that she doesn't, none of it did, and is just there so we didn't jump to the Borg too early. It's painfully lazy, and I'm thrilled that, with every day that passes, "Legacy" becomes less likely. Hell, the "Conspiracy" bugs work better for the foundation that was laid than the Borg do. They were defanged long ago.
|
|
|
Post by MrPicard on Mar 12, 2024 17:31:27 GMT
I actually read that interview only to find myself laughing at how much Matalas carefully avoided to simply say "season 2 was the worst thing ever" but clearly wanted to do so. Wait a few more years (when his Legacy idea is hopefully finally buried forever) and we'll get to hear the REAL behind the scenes mess.
Honestly tho, I take season 2 over season 3 any day. It was a mess, yes, but at least it was consistent with season 1's mess of "this show is trying its own thing". Season 3 was just badfic written by a hopeless TNG fanboy.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 12, 2024 20:01:35 GMT
I actually read that interview only to find myself laughing at how much Matalas carefully avoided to simply say "season 2 was the worst thing ever" but clearly wanted to do so. Wait a few more years (when his Legacy idea is hopefully finally buried forever) and we'll get to hear the REAL behind the scenes mess. Honestly tho, I take season 2 over season 3 any day. It was a mess, yes, but at least it was consistent with season 1's mess of "this show is trying its own thing". Season 3 was just badfic written by a hopeless TNG fanboy. This. At least S2 is consistent with S1 inasmuch as we have a man, more or less, quietly tidying up his affairs in his twilight. Both seasons tried to be a little more personal in spite of the, "OMG EVERYTHING IS AT STAKE....ALWAYS AND AGAIN." S3 sort of plays out like the Double Jeopardy Daily Double where every other frame is a video clue and you have to name the episode it references. The problem is that, for the most part, the callbacks are the only things that make sense.
|
|
|
Post by RobinBland on Mar 13, 2024 14:39:57 GMT
...Explains Terry Matalas, helpfully. A lot of what he's talking about - "exposition dumps" - "nobody cares" - is just bad writing. Explanations and exposition are supposed to be seeded throughout drama, so the audience doesn't notice them. There are ways of making it work. Or at least, the situ he is describing, is something that needs to be attended to by a script editor - or, at the very least - an exec. Which was his job. To be fair, it's true they had to contend with Covid and all the new rules of production after the pandemic, and the lack of time was a huge problem. But wow, we have here an explanation for why S2 was as woefully shoddy as it was, with all those different, undercooked ideas never coming to fruition. I still haven't been able to go back and watch S3, which I thought was also awful and for the same reasons, but I was outvoted by an overwhelming wave of collective fan nostalgia which seems to think it was one of the best seasons of Trek ever. But there it is, for all to see. They really, really needed a good script doctor. Maybe some of the fan service that stands in for actual character evolution and drama would still have got through, but I can't help thinking it's possible they might've been talked out of some of the lamer ideas. It's all a mess. I mean, I can give S2 a pass to some degree because COVID kinda upended everything and everyone, but I don't think that quite excuses S3. There are two glaring problems with it in my view: the syrupy bath in nostalgia is one. I don't think a script doctor would have helped that as much as one would like because I think it was a conscious choice. This is the last hurrah and we want to tug at all the heartstrings possible, and I don't think that was a choice made to gloss over story issues. This is where Matalas is honestly too much of a fan to be the one to do it. The other problem is the Shrike and Vadic. This threads through 80% of the season, and it's nothing. It's literally nothing to the story. How do you not read that and, "Why does she need to be here? Why is she here sucking up time only to just be done in Ep8 and absolutely none of it matters?" The answer is that she doesn't, none of it did, and is just there so we didn't jump to the Borg too early. It's painfully lazy, and I'm thrilled that, with every day that passes, "Legacy" becomes less likely. Hell, the "Conspiracy" bugs work better for the foundation that was laid than the Borg do. They were defanged long ago. Yes. All of the above! In S3, I think I was fairly patient up until ep 8, and then it became completely clear it was just pointless.
|
|
|
Post by RobinBland on Mar 13, 2024 14:45:32 GMT
I actually read that interview only to find myself laughing at how much Matalas carefully avoided to simply say "season 2 was the worst thing ever" but clearly wanted to do so. Wait a few more years (when his Legacy idea is hopefully finally buried forever) and we'll get to hear the REAL behind the scenes mess. Honestly tho, I take season 2 over season 3 any day. It was a mess, yes, but at least it was consistent with season 1's mess of "this show is trying its own thing". Season 3 was just badfic written by a hopeless TNG fanboy. This too. Perhaps if they'd taken one or two of the ideas for S2 - like Picard's dad - and explored them with a little more tact than via the metaphor of "Picard's house is his psyche," we'd have been in for some decent character drama. As it is, it feels like a Hallmark movie biopic of Picard, with none of the hokey charm. It all felt so piecemeal, especially in the rush at the ending to wrap up a bunch of character arcs. All that said, yeah, it's preferable to S3. I really, really hope Legacy never sees the light of day.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 13, 2024 16:49:59 GMT
I actually read that interview only to find myself laughing at how much Matalas carefully avoided to simply say "season 2 was the worst thing ever" but clearly wanted to do so. Wait a few more years (when his Legacy idea is hopefully finally buried forever) and we'll get to hear the REAL behind the scenes mess. Honestly tho, I take season 2 over season 3 any day. It was a mess, yes, but at least it was consistent with season 1's mess of "this show is trying its own thing". Season 3 was just badfic written by a hopeless TNG fanboy. This too. Perhaps if they'd taken one or two of the ideas for S2 - like Picard's dad - and explored them with a little more tact than via the metaphor of "Picard's house is his psyche," we'd have been in for some decent character drama. As it is, it feels like a Hallmark movie biopic of Picard, with none of the hokey charm. It all felt so piecemeal, especially in the rush at the ending to wrap up a bunch of character arcs. All that said, yeah, it's preferable to S3. I really, really hope Legacy never sees the light of day. Problem is, that never would have flown. I don't think the suits would have gone for it, and I don't think Sir Pat would have either. I don't think he would have gone for a deep dive into Picard's childhood like that. It would be all talk and no boom. As for Legacy, I think that's over. Matalas has moved on, though he says, "Call me." Thing is, I don't like the idea even if Matalas weren't running it.
|
|
|
Post by MrPicard on Mar 14, 2024 15:24:20 GMT
It REALLY would have helped PIC as a whole if they had actually had a writer who understood the character of Jean-Luc Picard. I get that they wanted to show him in a different point in his life (I can appreciate this) but you can't make a show about an older JLP without paying attention to his younger counterpart on TNG.
However, with seasons 1 and 2 I can at least see where they were coming from, as much as I disagree with pretty much every single one of their choices and ideas. With season 3 all I see is pandering to TNG fanboys by erasing and/or retconning pretty much everything that the previous two seasons established... while STILL getting it all wrong because they STILL didn't understand his character AND listened too much to a certain actor who has forgotten 95% of what happened on TNG and who based his opinions on the rather bizarre image of JLP he had in his head. (I will always love Sir Patrick but I will never forgive him for PIC.)
|
|
|
Post by RobinBland on Mar 16, 2024 11:25:32 GMT
I actually sort of like S1. Yeah, it's a fundamentally different take on the character of Picard; very different from how he was written and presented in TNG. Including even the movies, where he was an action hero of sorts for the latter three. S1 and S2 of Picard feel like Sir Pat's own headcanon, which is all well and good and it almost works for S1. Not where I'd have gone with the character, or, I imagine, one of the original TNG writers might've gone, but anyway... it sort of works if you squint. I have difficulty believing that the inner emotional life of the character, as glimpsed in TNG, would've led to the version of him we see in Picard but hell, I have trouble believing it's even the same Starfleet.
That said, there's an overall sincerity to the season that I enjoy, and I like most of the new characters, all of whom are given some depth (and all of whom are performed wonderfully).
S2 feels so thrown together, it's just bad TV. There's a lot of padding and banal explorations of interiority. And S3 is just such a nostalgia-fest there's barely anything original in there at all, with characters essentially unrecognisable from TNG in all sorts of "Plot says so" scenarios. I kinda liked the scenes with Worf, but honestly, that's about it. It's funny, back in the day when they killed the 1701-D in Generations, I always felt gypped that we never got to see more of her on the big screen and was a little sad about that. In theory, I should've felt great about her miraculous resurrection by Geordie in Picard S3, but it just felt so incredibly, crowd-pleasingly lazy my reaction was to feel totally numb to it. And that's where I ended up with that show - utterly unmoved, just incredulous that anyone thought any of it was good writing.
I guess I could pretend S2 and S3 were never made, and just have Picard's story end there at the end of S1. At least his condition gets cured and there's that genuinely heartfelt send-off for Data. [Don't worry, kids! It gets retconned again and we get him back for S3!]
Or I could just ignore the whole show entirely... For all its myriad flaws, Nemesis was a better ending, at least for Picard.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 17, 2024 15:14:21 GMT
It REALLY would have helped PIC as a whole if they had actually had a writer who understood the character of Jean-Luc Picard. I get that they wanted to show him in a different point in his life (I can appreciate this) but you can't make a show about an older JLP without paying attention to his younger counterpart on TNG. However, with seasons 1 and 2 I can at least see where they were coming from, as much as I disagree with pretty much every single one of their choices and ideas. With season 3 all I see is pandering to TNG fanboys by erasing and/or retconning pretty much everything that the previous two seasons established... while STILL getting it all wrong because they STILL didn't understand his character AND listened too much to a certain actor who has forgotten 95% of what happened on TNG and who based his opinions on the rather bizarre image of JLP he had in his head. (I will always love Sir Patrick but I will never forgive him for PIC.) I mean, I don't know, but I sometimes wonder if he's ever looked at Picard as a...real person? If he were outside of it all watching his guy, would he think that all this was normal for this guy, or would he look at a man like Picard do a lot of this swashbuckler stuff and just think, "No. This doesn't make sense." Especially the 80-year-old version.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 17, 2024 16:39:48 GMT
I actually sort of like S1. Yeah, it's a fundamentally different take on the character of Picard; very different from how he was written and presented in TNG. Including even the movies, where he was an action hero of sorts for the latter three. S1 and S2 of Picard feel like Sir Pat's own headcanon, which is all well and good and it almost works for S1. Not where I'd have gone with the character, or, I imagine, one of the original TNG writers might've gone, but anyway... it sort of works if you squint. I have difficulty believing that the inner emotional life of the character, as glimpsed in TNG, would've led to the version of him we see in Picard but hell, I have trouble believing it's even the same Starfleet. That said, there's an overall sincerity to the season that I enjoy, and I like most of the new characters, all of whom are given some depth (and all of whom are performed wonderfully). S2 feels so thrown together, it's just bad TV. There's a lot of padding and banal explorations of interiority. And S3 is just such a nostalgia-fest there's barely anything original in there at all, with characters essentially unrecognisable from TNG in all sorts of "Plot says so" scenarios. I kinda liked the scenes with Worf, but honestly, that's about it. It's funny, back in the day when they killed the 1701-D in Generations, I always felt gypped that we never got to see more of her on the big screen and was a little sad about that. In theory, I should've felt great about her miraculous resurrection by Geordie in Picard S3, but it just felt so incredibly, crowd-pleasingly lazy my reaction was to feel totally numb to it. And that's where I ended up with that show - utterly unmoved, just incredulous that anyone thought any of it was good writing. I guess I could pretend S2 and S3 were never made, and just have Picard's story end there at the end of S1. At least his condition gets cured and there's that genuinely heartfelt send-off for Data. [Don't worry, kids! It gets retconned again and we get him back for S3!] Or I could just ignore the whole show entirely... For all its myriad flaws, Nemesis was a better ending, at least for Picard. All of this. Honestly, I can at least say I "get" S1. I can see what they were trying to do, the story they were trying to tell, and the message they wanted to send. If I get it, I generally find myself a little more lenient with flaws. I might look at it through a prism of what I might have done differently to get there, but if I get it and I think the message is a worthwhile one I tend to look more at the positives than trying to pick it apart. And S1 gave Data the heartfelt sendoff he'd deserved since Nemesis because THAT part of Nemesis never sat right with me. It's so...discordant. It felt all at once that they were dismissing his death with kind of trite small talk, while still trying to ape the resonance of TWOK--as the entire film tried to do, pretty much point for point. Also, while, S2 feels like, I dunno how to put it beyond a...collage of ideas; some good, some bad, but none of them are fleshed out or fully integrated into the overall story. There are things watchable and enjoyable in it, in much the way I've looked at almost all of DSC. Picard S3? It is, from first frame to last, shameless pandering. It doesn't even have the virtue of being clever pandering. With TMP I still get chills when that shuttle makes that starboard turn and the Goldsmith score peaks. You knew that was coming because you can't have TOS without the E, but, with the score, and the fairly sedate tone to the film up to that point you're swept by the anticipation. Then, when you see the epitome of class and elegance that is that ship...it still hits me. In IV, you've spent two hours watching these people in a fish out of water story prove they still have it. And they're still a crew even if they're working separately before they set you up. "A ship is a ship." and "I hope it's Excelsior." They don't NEED the Enterprise, and it feels like the beginning of a new chapter for all of them and you have just maybe settled into the idea that that means a new ship, and maybe just re-christened Excelsior, and you're kinda looking forward to that. Then the shuttle goes to Excelsior before it doesn't. Up...and over...then the music peaks again, and then you could weep. Those are loving moments to the ship. They respect her as a character AND understand storytelling enough that you need to build to the moment, and, sometimes a little misdirection is nice, too. These are examples of manipulating the audience while still respecting the audience. You feel nothing in Picard because it was never sort of a secret as in TMP or IV. You feel nothing because the show was so awash in nostalgia from EPs 1 to 9 that it was never in the slightest doubt that resurrecting the D was what they were going to do. Add to that that all the nostalgia to that point had been so ham-fisted and juvenile, like Lower Decks, writ large, you're reduced to sighing, rolling your eyes, and muttering, "Just get on with it." under your breath. But that could just have been me.
|
|
|
Post by nombrecomun on Mar 17, 2024 17:47:41 GMT
Or I could just ignore the whole show entirely... For all its myriad flaws, Nemesis was a better ending, at least for Picard. I'm at ...All Good Things when it comes to the end of the TNG franchise. That was the best send off. I get the need to capitalize on their success commercializing through movies but those were anywhere from ok to awful. And then Matalas rips off that ending for PIC S3. Of course he did.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 17, 2024 17:58:01 GMT
Or I could just ignore the whole show entirely... For all its myriad flaws, Nemesis was a better ending, at least for Picard. I'm at ...All Good Things when it comes to the end of the TNG franchise. That was the best send off. I get the need to capitalize on their success commercializing through movies but those were anywhere from ok to awful. And then Matalas rips off that ending for PIC S3. Of course he did. FC is the best of them mechanically, and the most successful, but I only find it slightly better than mediocre. It's fine. And no disrespect to Kriege's performance because it's absolutely fine, too, but the character was a mistake. And when S3 of Pic was running I remember Matalas gushing on Twitter over recreating the poker scene. I'm like, yeah, because you can't come up with your own scene to convey a similar tone. You have to straight rip something you have no hope of topping.
|
|
|
Post by MrPicard on Mar 18, 2024 12:02:42 GMT
It REALLY would have helped PIC as a whole if they had actually had a writer who understood the character of Jean-Luc Picard. I get that they wanted to show him in a different point in his life (I can appreciate this) but you can't make a show about an older JLP without paying attention to his younger counterpart on TNG. However, with seasons 1 and 2 I can at least see where they were coming from, as much as I disagree with pretty much every single one of their choices and ideas. With season 3 all I see is pandering to TNG fanboys by erasing and/or retconning pretty much everything that the previous two seasons established... while STILL getting it all wrong because they STILL didn't understand his character AND listened too much to a certain actor who has forgotten 95% of what happened on TNG and who based his opinions on the rather bizarre image of JLP he had in his head. (I will always love Sir Patrick but I will never forgive him for PIC.) I mean, I don't know, but I sometimes wonder if he's ever looked at Picard as a...real person? If he were outside of it all watching his guy, would he think that all this was normal for this guy, or would he look at a man like Picard do a lot of this swashbuckler stuff and just think, "No. This doesn't make sense." Especially the 80-year-old version. I think the problem actually IS that he's looking at Jean-Luc like a real person. He thinks he and Jean-Luc have things in common because back in the day he fused his own personality with Jean-Luc's. He WAS Jean-Luc Picard, in quite a few ways. He still is. You can sense it when you're with him. Jean-Luc is there. The thing is tho... when TNG ended, so did the merger of the two. That's why the movies were increasingly weird for Jean-Luc as a character - because Sir Patrick's idea of what Jean-Luc was like did not match the idea of what he had actually BEEN like on TNG. Partly because Sir Patrick never re-watched TNG (can't fault him), partly because his own life moved on but Jean-Luc's life was still at the "All Good Things..." point. And now the difference is even more glaring. So many years have passed. Sir Patrick is a very different person now. So is Jean-Luc. The problem is that Sir Patrick thought the changes in his own life can be pushed onto Jean-Luc's life, but without actually remembering what Jean-Luc had really been like. One example is the whole shoe-horned thing with the mom. Sir Patrick had had issues with his dad. Family issues. So, he figured Jean-Luc could have had the same. The problem here is that no one told him that TNG pretty much established a lot about his childhood and his mother. That his mother even appeared on the show, and that there was no indication whatsoever that she had been dead. He was lucky that Jean-Luc's reaction to seeing his mother on TNG was incredibly emotional and it made sense. And PIC retconned things by mentioning that Jean-Luc "used to imagine his mother alive". But it was still a MASSIVE retcon. It came out of nowhere. It had no basis whatsoever on TNG.
Another example is the fact that Crusher goes on about Jean-Luc "not wanting childen" and the whole story arc that goes throughout the show, that Jean-Luc dislikes children and that he never settled down etc. The problem is that "Inner Light" had him with two children AND very much settled down. (Generations did the same nonsense tho, which is another reason why they should have known better.) Sir Patrick still believes Jean-Luc hates children. And YET he KNOWS about Inner Light. He names it as his favorite episode. It's beyond me how he can't see how the episode pretty much contradicts the entirety of PIC in this regard. He just thinks "Picard dislikes children and never wanted any" and that's it, even though TNG itself established that this was no longer the case after Inner Light. It was his idea that Crusher should be the mother of the kid. Why? The relationship was absolutely dropped during the movies. There was nothing going on there anymore. Crusher had told him NO in the 7th season and he moved on. But Sir Patrick doesn't remember that either, of course. He just thought Crusher would make sense, so, Crusher was the mother. It made NO sense. Her character is awful, but not even she deserved this kind of "I hid your kid from you" assassination. Vash would have made a ZILLION more sense here. Her I can absolutely see hiding a child from Jean-Luc in this manner after she came back into his life for a one night stand after Nemesis. Or even Anij. But Crusher made NO sense. But Sir Patrick suggested it and so it happened. This is what I mean - he never stopped to think if it made sense for Jean-Luc because he assumed he and Jean-Luc are still the same person and HE would totally have had an on-off affair with someone. But Jean-Luc is NOT the type who does this. But in Sir Patrick's mind the two are one and the same person. That's why there's such a large discrepancy between the JLP we knew and the one we see now. It's why people are like "It's just Patrick Stewart in a Starfleet uniform". Because it literally IS. Because he thinks he is still one and the same as Jean-Luc Picard. It worked back in the TNG days, so, it works today still. Problem is... it doesn't. What he should have done was to re-watch TNG (I know, wishful thinking, but still). Remember what things had been like. I'm PRETTY DAMN SURE he would have reached a totally different conclusion as to where Jean-Luc would be today. I'm pretty sure he would have made him a grumpy archeologist who's roaming the galaxy or something like that.
...
I love how Matalas was all like "nooo we have a reaaaally cool ending for the third season" on Twitter when someone asked if they had done a TOS like ending where the whole crew flies back into space together. It sounded like as if it was this MASSIVELY amazing thing... and then it was just a rip off of "All Good Things...". Wow. Amazing. (Sarcasm.) Dude can't even write his own badfic's ending. It would be funny if it wasn't so damn tragic.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 18, 2024 16:24:50 GMT
You have an excellent bead on this, for some strange Picard-related reason that I cannot fathom. Someone should have sat him down and, "Okay, it's your belief that JLP never wanted kids, and that didn't change. In the beginning that's very true. There are no shortage of episodes that push this idea. But, his relationship with Wesley grew. Then there's "The Inner Light." There's "Generations." Some part of him wanted children, had them, and was happy. How do we reconcile that journey to where he is now?" And that journey can be reconciled, I think. I think that it can be reconciled in a reasonably straightforward manner. Perhaps Post-Nemesis Picard actually tried to do it. He tried to have a family and live that life. But his daddy-issues followed him. Maybe he started seeing his father in how he was raising his child and sabotaged it, using the Romulan evacuation and the other diplomatic work to cover his failures and choices in something more noble. It can be as simple as, "Having a thing is not so pleasing, after all, as wanting..." and he was sort of actually deluded by those out-of-body experiences to some degree when it came to his desires and capabilities. I can see anyone in an "Inner Light" scenario holding on to a sliver of, "I don't care, I was on the bridge. I know who I am. I know what I was, and none of this is real." and so you approach it all differently. You take the "family" for what it is, meet them as they are, and let yourself go. You take your personal baggage out of it because this is all just a glorified holo-novel anyway. Why WOULDN'T the CHARACTER of "Picard Dad" be a better than the actual man in that case? "Generations?" Even more so. I mean, he could stay there for, what for all of us out here would be 100,000 years, and how will the experience not be perfect when the whole place is like "being inside joy?" It's a lot harder when it's real, so maybe he let it all fall apart until the kid's Mom calls it a day and moves on with the kid. Having THEM come back into the picture makes a lot more sense to me than pulling the Bev/JLP thing out of the badfic hat. But those would be new characters and they would have to have some depth, as would delving into their past together, and devoting time to that would take time away from critical plot elements like nostalgia and Vadic. You can even still justify a one-night stand. With Vash. With Ro. With someone entirely new. But not with Bev and all the beating the square peg into a round hole that they did to get them there. *** "It's a GREAT ending. You'll love it. I know all that's true because Ron Moore and Brannon Braga wrote it 30 years ago.
|
|
|
Post by MrPicard on Mar 21, 2024 15:00:32 GMT
What it comes down to is that someone should have told Sir Patrick the whole story of Jean-Luc Picard and why his ideas for him made little to no sense and that they would alienate large parts of the fanbase (if there's one thing those who like and dislike the show can agree on it's that JLP is out of character in the first two seasons in particular). But then, they probably feared he'd walk out on them if he didn't get his wish(es). And he probably would have walked out on them at first - but he's the type who re-thinks things. He explodes and THEN he thinks. I'm pretty sure he would have re-considered. And then sat down and actually watched some TNG. All it would have taken would have been someone who had the guts to tell him "dude, your knowledge of Picard is incomplete and based on his pop culture image".
Vash would have made perfect sense. The fandom knows her, so, no need to waste time with introductions. I could have seen Jean-Luc falling into yet another affair with her because he was lonely. Just one night. He was drunk. Whatever. This sort of thing WOULD make sense for a lonely and depressed Jean-Luc. Hell, I could even see Vash DELIBERATELY seducing him so that she'd have his child for whatever mischievous reason. It made NO sense whatsoever for him to have this toxic thing going on with Crusher where they tried to have a relationship five times or something. This is something Sir Patrick would try. But not Jean-Luc Picard. He would stumble all over his feelings during the first attempt and he'd never try anything again. This is what I mean when I say someone should have told Sir Patrick "your idea makes no sense, please re-watch TNG first". But they were so desperate to make the show that they were willing to agree to just about anything he suggested and then write weird plots around it.
I do think Jean-Luc actually missed his kids. I mean imagine you're being swept away from your life and you wake up with a wife and then after a while you realize you're not going anywhere and you settle into your new life for 30 years or something and you have kids and a grandchild... and then suddenly you wake up AGAIN and everyone you loved is gone and none of it was real. This had to be the most traumatizing thing in his whole LIFE. Even worse than the Borg and Gul Madred. Just because TNG in its episodic nature never explored this doesn't mean this wasn't traumatizing. THIS would have impacted his wish to have children. He would have feared that they vanish just like Batai and Meribor did. The reasoning is right there. AND then they showed him the Nexus where he had kids all over again and then THEY weren't real either. There's his trauma. For the LIFE of me I will never understand why they ignored Inner Light so completely. Because it went against Sir Patrick's pop culture picture of "Picard was always married to his ship and a loner"? (Most likely answer.)
|
|
|
Post by SherlockHolmes on Mar 23, 2024 15:32:51 GMT
I just cannot accept anything in Picard I want the whole g-damned thing retconned. 1. There is no way in Hell the Enterprise D would be a working vessel again 2. Lights, emit light. There are more lights on the Stargazer/Titan set than any other set before it, and there is no light. How the fk to you break physics like that? You know what, actually, THIS is issue one for me. 3. Picard and Beverly - Just what the fking hell, I thought they matured out of that romance stuff. 4. I'm pretty sure that, in the future, women can't 'accidently' get pregnant. (Yes I know, there's Sisko and Cassidy, but he forgot his injection because he was fighting a War) But there also Crusher's age to consider. 5. I wanted Data to come back so badly, but I still don't understand hw the fk they did it. 6. Killing off recurring characters or notable character (Spoilers-you know what, fk it, I'll save you lost time) Hugh, Icheb, Maddox, Shelby, but the one that pisses me off most, Ro. 7. Starfleet letting Romulans die because..androids... 8. Romulans fearing AI out of left field. WTF? 9. Picard leaving the Enterprise during his career. GOD-DMED PERIOD. 10. More Troi Suffering. Like lets make every gd-dmned thing tragic. 11. The Color Grading...oh my god, its desert colors all the damned time. I Fking hate color grading. PERIOD. 12. Did I mention lights? I did? Well it such a neuscence that it counts again because I say it does. LIGHTS EMIT LIGHT PEOPLE!!!! 13. Dystopian Federation - THIS!!! THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS!!!! HOW THE FK IS THIS EVEN STAR TREK ANYMORE? 14. THAT UGLY, SLICEES OF PIE MISSING, MONSTROSITY ,ARMED LIKE THE GRISSOM, VORLON HELMET STARDRIVED PIECE OF CRAP, IS NOT- I REPEAT NOT- AN ENTERPRISE. 15. The lack of the Enterprise E- Hell, I think it should Still be in service. It would only be 28 years old by this point 16. The E being only 28 years old is one thing, BUT RETIRING HER F'ing (pun intended) successor already? Seriously. What could be so catastrophic that you junk a brand new vessel that's completely intact? 17. VFX- Because all of Nu-trek's VFX looks like crap (Even SNW, and I love that series) 18. Everybody hate Everybody. GD-DMN!!! 19. Lights....there's these things called photons that make up light. They tend to illuminate things...SOMEONE TELL THE CINEMATOGRAPHER BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY HE OR SOMEBODY DOES NOT KNOW THAT!!! You should've watched Bill Nye The Science Guy, he explains how light works. IF you have a lightbulb, there should be light. God!!! 20. Is it me or does it seem everyone is out of character? 21. GET RID OF THE FKING WINDOWS. Viewscreens people. VIEW...SCREENS... 22. Shiny Floors....why the hell is everything so shiny but painted black. Are you purposely creating a cinematographers nightmare? Absolute stupidity inflating the cost of production. 23. When recycling sets, there is absolutely no talent at disguising the sets or transforming them. Herman Zimmerman could stretch a penny, and make convincing conversion of sets. NuTrek doesn't even try. 24. The Warp Effect. I don't care whats realistic or not, but Star Trek is not fking Star Wars 25. For the 4th Time LIGHTS SHOULD EMIT LIGHT!!! I CANT SEE A GD-DMNED THING!! I TURNED THE BRIGHTNESS AND CONTRAST UP TO MAXIMUM ON MY FKING TV. I STILL CAN'T SEE CRAP ON THIS SHOW,
|
|
|
Post by BeastBoy on Mar 23, 2024 16:04:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 23, 2024 20:25:52 GMT
I just cannot accept anything in Picard I want the whole g-damned thing retconned. 1. There is no way in Hell the Enterprise D would be a working vessel again 2. Lights, emit light. There are more lights on the Stargazer/Titan set than any other set before it, and there is no light. How the fk to you break physics like that? You know what, actually, THIS is issue one for me. 3. Picard and Beverly - Just what the fking hell, I thought they matured out of that romance stuff. 4. I'm pretty sure that, in the future, women can't 'accidently' get pregnant. (Yes I know, there's Sisko and Cassidy, but he forgot his injection because he was fighting a War) But there also Crusher's age to consider. 5. I wanted Data to come back so badly, but I still don't understand hw the fk they did it. 6. Killing off recurring characters or notable character (Spoilers-you know what, fk it, I'll save you lost time) Hugh, Icheb, Maddox, Shelby, but the one that pisses me off most, Ro. 7. Starfleet letting Romulans die because..androids... 8. Romulans fearing AI out of left field. WTF? 9. Picard leaving the Enterprise during his career. GOD-DMED PERIOD. 10. More Troi Suffering. Like lets make every gd-dmned thing tragic. 11. The Color Grading...oh my god, its desert colors all the damned time. I Fking hate color grading. PERIOD. 12. Did I mention lights? I did? Well it such a neuscence that it counts again because I say it does. LIGHTS EMIT LIGHT PEOPLE!!!! 13. Dystopian Federation - THIS!!! THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS!!!! HOW THE FK IS THIS EVEN STAR TREK ANYMORE? 14. THAT UGLY, SLICEES OF PIE MISSING, MONSTROSITY ,ARMED LIKE THE GRISSOM, VORLON HELMET STARDRIVED PIECE OF CRAP, IS NOT- I REPEAT NOT- AN ENTERPRISE. 15. The lack of the Enterprise E- Hell, I think it should Still be in service. It would only be 28 years old by this point 16. The E being only 28 years old is one thing, BUT RETIRING HER F'ing (pun intended) successor already? Seriously. What could be so catastrophic that you junk a brand new vessel that's completely intact? 17. VFX- Because all of Nu-trek's VFX looks like crap (Even SNW, and I love that series) 18. Everybody hate Everybody. GD-DMN!!! 19. Lights....there's these things called photons that make up light. They tend to illuminate things...SOMEONE TELL THE CINEMATOGRAPHER BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY HE OR SOMEBODY DOES NOT KNOW THAT!!! You should've watched Bill Nye The Science Guy, he explains how light works. IF you have a lightbulb, there should be light. God!!! 20. Is it me or does it seem everyone is out of character? 21. GET RID OF THE FKING WINDOWS. Viewscreens people. VIEW...SCREENS... 22. Shiny Floors....why the hell is everything so shiny but painted black. Are you purposely creating a cinematographers nightmare? Absolute stupidity inflating the cost of production. 23. When recycling sets, there is absolutely no talent at disguising the sets or transforming them. Herman Zimmerman could stretch a penny, and make convincing conversion of sets. NuTrek doesn't even try. 24. The Warp Effect. I don't care whats realistic or not, but Star Trek is not fking Star Wars 25. For the 4th Time LIGHTS SHOULD EMIT LIGHT!!! I CANT SEE A GD-DMNED THING!! I TURNED THE BRIGHTNESS AND CONTRAST UP TO MAXIMUM ON MY FKING TV. I STILL CAN'T SEE CRAP ON THIS SHOW, 1. I can see it, but it would take way more reason than what was presented onscreen to justify it being the D. I think Geordi could take just about any ship in the fleet and sever the networking tech enough to run it. If for no other reason than he worked on generations of ships that didn't have it. 2. The light isn't QUITE as an immersion-breaking thing for me, but I get it. I don't understand how they function in such a dark environment all the time. Battlestations? Sure. It at least arguably would help you keep your focus on your station. Daily life? I don't get it. 3. There was never anything there between them to begin with. Picard has more genuine chemistry with Q than he ever did with Crusher. 4. Women can get pregnant now at the age she did then. The problem is that human biology isn't going to evolve to something else in 400 years. Beverly COULD get pregnant, but it'd require a conscious choice and medical intervention. She didn't "accidentally" get pregnant. 5. Data was gone in S1 and it should have stayed that way. 6. Shelby was the worst of it for me. She has a HISTORY with networked intelligence and hacking and Borg. That the woman I saw in BOBW would be just fine with networking the entire forking fleet is insane. And then she just insta-dies one minute after she delivers her Starfleet cheerleader speech. 20. Nah. Pretty much everyone.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 23, 2024 20:26:38 GMT
Sherlock wants the rainbow streamers, not off-white hyperspace.
|
|
|
Post by MrPicard on Mar 25, 2024 14:43:57 GMT
What I find far more weird about the Crusher pregnancy (other than the correct assessment that there's no way she could just have gotten pregnant without some serious medical intervention) is the fact that BOTH parties need to forget the injection.
So. Jean-Luc Picard. The guy they portray as being terrified of having kids (which is inaccurate, yes, but the show beats us over the head with it, so I'm running with it here). Forgetting whether he's still protected by the injection before going on a nice little love affair vacation with Crusher where he knew they would most likely end up in bed again. Yeah. That makes sense. Not.
Any halfway decent fic writer would notice this and be like "wait, this doesn't make any sense, it contradicts itself, I need to re-write this".
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 25, 2024 16:00:43 GMT
What I find far more weird about the Crusher pregnancy (other than the correct assessment that there's no way she could just have gotten pregnant without some serious medical intervention) is the fact that BOTH parties need to forget the injection. So. Jean-Luc Picard. The guy they portray as being terrified of having kids (which is inaccurate, yes, but the show beats us over the head with it, so I'm running with it here). Forgetting whether he's still protected by the injection before going on a nice little love affair vacation with Crusher where he knew they would most likely end up in bed again. Yeah. That makes sense. Not. Any halfway decent fic writer would notice this and be like "wait, this doesn't make any sense, it contradicts itself, I need to re-write this". It doesn't survive a pass with a story editor who got his creds from an online school with $350. It makes no sense at all when the guy is almost paranoid about NOT fathering a kid. I just don't grasp why they did this at all. It wasn't any good when they tried it in "Bloodlines," and yet, somehow, it still works way better there than here.
|
|
|
Post by RobinBland on Mar 25, 2024 17:45:44 GMT
I just cannot accept anything in Picard... 20. Nah. Pretty much everyone....[is out of character]. I've greatly enjoyed reading the recent posts in this thread. Glad it's not just me. I guess if you come at Picard as a show that takes place in a different universe to that of TNG, it might be a way of getting your head around it - although that's not actually going to improve your perception of shoddy writing. Also, that's not what I signed up for.
|
|
|
Post by nombrecomun on Mar 25, 2024 18:28:03 GMT
20. Nah. Pretty much everyone....[is out of character]. I've greatly enjoyed reading the recent posts in this thread. Glad it's not just me. I guess if you come at Picard as a show that takes place in a different universe to that of TNG, it might be a way of getting your head around it - although that's not actually going to improve your perception of shoddy writing. Also, that's not what I signed up for. Exactly. It's still bad writing anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 25, 2024 20:24:41 GMT
20. Nah. Pretty much everyone....[is out of character]. I've greatly enjoyed reading the recent posts in this thread. Glad it's not just me. I guess if you come at Picard as a show that takes place in a different universe to that of TNG, it might be a way of getting your head around it - although that's not actually going to improve your perception of shoddy writing. Also, that's not what I signed up for. Basically this. S3 feels like a continuation of some other world's TNG. They all have the same names, but in this one, Picard and Riker had a somewhat contentious history, Picard and Crusher had some long affair at some point, which led them led them to reconnect, and, bam...kid. That Geordi doesn't really have a zest for life and an optimistic spirit. All these versions just belong to some other show. And that's on top of The Shrike, and Vadic, and Changelings, and Section 31 that appear here with no meaning. All that is so cobbled together for the sake of putting something on TV, helmed by someone who seems to have never understood it. There would have been so many ways to get that gang back together to do a TNG story, and one that had nothing to do with the Borg. I'm so tired of them and bored of them, and while they had an iconic moment, too many people misinterpreted that as, somehow, being what TNG was about to the point that the entire Trek franchise has never let them go, to itss detriment. Because. At this point, the Borg are lazy contrivances you pull out as though that does 90% of the work for you when it comes to writing. TENSION!!! Simple to explain to the audience if they need it! And so very much BOOM! BAM! KAPOW!" If you're gonna do one last ride with TNG, BOBW was never your template. It was one iconic moment. TNG is "Where No One Has Gone Before." It's, "The Chase." It's taking the journey together to something greater. It's "The Pegasus" and what "Insurrection" at least tried to be. It's about these friends bonded in service fighting for ideals, and, in so doing, showing why those values are worth standing up for. But, for the love of God, it's not the Borg for the 47th time.
|
|
|
Post by SherlockHolmes on Mar 25, 2024 21:02:32 GMT
HEh heh "47th time". I see what you did there.
26. WHO WAS CALLING THE SHOTS FOR THE VILLAINS? Is hand possession guy just a random changling? 27. SO BEING PROGRAMED BY THE ORD GIVES YOU SUPER DUPER NINJA POWERS....HOW COME THE OTHER BORG CAN'T DO THESE THINGS? Like apparently his "Programming" makes him Jack Bourne 28. THEY BEEN PRESSING SECTION 31 SO MUCH, YOU KEEP TELLING ME HOW POWEFUL AND KNOWING AN ORGANIZATION THEY ARE.....then they let this conspiracy happen......SAY WHHHHAAAATTT?
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 25, 2024 21:36:19 GMT
HEh heh "47th time". I see what you did there. 26. WHO WAS CALLING THE SHOTS FOR THE VILLAINS? Is hand possession guy just a random changling? 27. SO BEING PROGRAMED BY THE ORD GIVES YOU SUPER DUPER NINJA POWERS....HOW COME THE OTHER BORG CAN'T DO THESE THINGS? Like apparently his "Programming" makes him Jack Bourne 28. THEY BEEN PRESSING SECTION 31 SO MUCH, YOU KEEP TELLING ME HOW POWEFUL AND KNOWING AN ORGANIZATION THEY ARE.....then they let this conspiracy happen......SAY WHHHHAAAATTT? 26. Apparently. I mean, after EP 8, they didn't need the filler anymore and just dropped all of it....woah...almost like it never mattered. 27. Even if the Borg just hatched a few dozen of "race x" -- assimilated people that look like they always did, and are even unaware themselves that they were assimilated until activated and then they can basically become Neo from The Matrix, the Borg would have been far more successful. Not to put too fine a point on it, but you could spread assimilation like an STD. 28. This, too. Even just give me a few scenes that revolve around, "Hey, Picard, we didn't do this. What help do you need? Okay, while you do this, we're doing this, and we'll meet in the middle." But S31 is only as strong as the story requires.
|
|
|
Post by MrPicard on Mar 27, 2024 7:10:41 GMT
What I find far more weird about the Crusher pregnancy (other than the correct assessment that there's no way she could just have gotten pregnant without some serious medical intervention) is the fact that BOTH parties need to forget the injection. So. Jean-Luc Picard. The guy they portray as being terrified of having kids (which is inaccurate, yes, but the show beats us over the head with it, so I'm running with it here). Forgetting whether he's still protected by the injection before going on a nice little love affair vacation with Crusher where he knew they would most likely end up in bed again. Yeah. That makes sense. Not. Any halfway decent fic writer would notice this and be like "wait, this doesn't make any sense, it contradicts itself, I need to re-write this". It doesn't survive a pass with a story editor who got his creds from an online school with $350. It makes no sense at all when the guy is almost paranoid about NOT fathering a kid. I just don't grasp why they did this at all. It wasn't any good when they tried it in "Bloodlines," and yet, somehow, it still works way better there than here. I think it worked somewhat in "Bloodlines" because Jean-Luc was younger when he had that fling with Miranda Vigo. (I think he was 41 or something.) He might have been a little less responsible and a little more reckless still. It's still not exactly great storytelling but at least it was a little more believable. Maybe injections weren't as good back in those days. Who knows. There's a little more room for alternative explanations there. And of course Miranda Vigo wasn't as old as Crusher was.
But post Nemesis Jean-Luc with all the added "fathering a child" baggage from Inner Light and Generations and whatnot? No way this guy would forget about his injection. In fact, I can see him actively CHECKING if it was still valid before he went on that vacation with Crusher.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 27, 2024 15:58:23 GMT
It doesn't survive a pass with a story editor who got his creds from an online school with $350. It makes no sense at all when the guy is almost paranoid about NOT fathering a kid. I just don't grasp why they did this at all. It wasn't any good when they tried it in "Bloodlines," and yet, somehow, it still works way better there than here. I think it worked somewhat in "Bloodlines" because Jean-Luc was younger when he had that fling with Miranda Vigo. (I think he was 41 or something.) He might have been a little less responsible and a little more reckless still. It's still not exactly great storytelling but at least it was a little more believable. Maybe injections weren't as good back in those days. Who knows. There's a little more room for alternative explanations there. And of course Miranda Vigo wasn't as old as Crusher was.
But post Nemesis Jean-Luc with all the added "fathering a child" baggage from Inner Light and Generations and whatnot? No way this guy would forget about his injection. In fact, I can see him actively CHECKING if it was still valid before he went on that vacation with Crusher. Also, Stweart seemed to fit better with the "Bloodlines" kid. I've seen Speelers in other things and he's fine, but I think he just sorta sticks out here and makes the problems worse.
|
|
|
Post by MrPicard on Mar 28, 2024 6:41:44 GMT
I think it worked somewhat in "Bloodlines" because Jean-Luc was younger when he had that fling with Miranda Vigo. (I think he was 41 or something.) He might have been a little less responsible and a little more reckless still. It's still not exactly great storytelling but at least it was a little more believable. Maybe injections weren't as good back in those days. Who knows. There's a little more room for alternative explanations there. And of course Miranda Vigo wasn't as old as Crusher was.
But post Nemesis Jean-Luc with all the added "fathering a child" baggage from Inner Light and Generations and whatnot? No way this guy would forget about his injection. In fact, I can see him actively CHECKING if it was still valid before he went on that vacation with Crusher. Also, Stweart seemed to fit better with the "Bloodlines" kid. I've seen Speelers in other things and he's fine, but I think he just sorta sticks out here and makes the problems worse. The problem is that Speleers is AND looks 10 years older than the character he's playing and it shows. It's not immersive at all. Matalas literally said they hired him while actively KNOWING he didn't look the age of the character he was playing. And it's true - when the casting sheet for Jack Crusher leaked they were looking for an actor in his early 20s. They simply hoped the audience wouldn't really notice. They hired Speleers because "he looks like a young Patrick Stewart". I'll give them the slight resemblance, yes, but it's still lazy. I'm all for sticking with an actor you find but then you have to simply find a way to rewrite your plot and MAKE SOMEONE ELSE THE MOTHER. Jean-Luc would have had to father at the end of TNG or at around Generations for Speleer's age to work. Perfect opportunity to bring in Vash again. Or some technobabble from one of the Nexus kids he had. Whatever. Do whatever. Just don't go for the dumbest option, which is to stick with the 'Crusher as the mother' plan and hire an actor who looks ten years older than your plot's child is supposed to look like - oh, wait... And yeah, I liked the vibe between Jean-Luc and Jason Vigo. That was about a zillion times more realistic. I liked that they clashed because of how reckless Jason was and how Jean-Luc had to get past his weird expectations he'd have for a son of his (and maybe remember that he himself used to be reckless as hell back in the day). They did more character development for both characters in one not-even-mediocre TNG episode than they did in the entire third season of PIC.
|
|