|
Post by nombrecomun on Nov 27, 2023 22:48:04 GMT
For a couple of months now there has been quite the handwringing about a second matchup between Biden and Trump, the all but confirmed GOP presidential candidate, and how that's not gonna go the same way again.
While I think Biden has done a relatively decent job the optics of his age are not easily dismissed. Add to that a generally inexperienced and unlikeable VP. Dems' messaging has never been anywhere as impacting as to what Reps' have been able to do.
I thought he was going to be a transitionary leader, passing the torch to someone else; a pause in the Trump-led insanity. But it seems like he wants to continue....and I think that's going to be a big mistake.
So that's it. What are your thoughts on a very old Biden running again. If not him, then who? Is it too late for that?
|
|
|
Post by scenario on Nov 28, 2023 18:55:33 GMT
The Republicans are driven by anger. They have no plan to fix anything. They just blame everyone whose not straight, white and Christian.
Democrats want to fix things but they have very different ideas on how to do it.
I laugh at the complaint that Harris is inexperienced. Being inexperienced has become a job requirement for president for over 100 years.
I think that Biden has done a decent job in difficult times. His main problem is the inflation caused directly and indirectly by the plague. Directly because of worldwide broken supply chains. Indirectly by attitude changes. Many older workers retired and when they left the workplace they realized how toxic it was and didn't come back. Other workers found better jobs. People en masse decided it just wasn't worth working in a toxic work environment for low pay. Companies which treated their employees well did better but couldn't compete with toxic companies. Companies raised prices to pay workers. Other companies followed suit.
Biden really is too old but so far there's no one to replace him. No one with any relevant experience has a chance because that means they have a track record. Once a Democrat has a track record, 1/4 of voters will like them and 3/4 will hate them. You need someone whose charismatic with as little actual experience as possible. They need to be optimistic and talk in generalities.
|
|
|
Post by nombrecomun on Nov 28, 2023 23:47:26 GMT
No one with any relevant experience has a chance because that means they have a track record. Once a Democrat has a track record, 1/4 of voters will like them and 3/4 will hate them. This is very hard to acknowledge but makes sense. That's why someone like Gavin Newsom probably couldn't become President. "California" by itself is off putting to many Americans. I think that's why someone like Clinton did well. No one knows anyone from a state like Arkansas. No one knew Obama either. Biden is an anomaly but I think that worked because of how terrible Trump was. Still....I think it's important to acknowledge that Biden is not doing well in polls regardless of how good of a job he's doing. His age, and the perception of his age, is very concerning to many Americans.
|
|
|
Post by scenario on Nov 29, 2023 0:54:54 GMT
I agree that Biden is too old, he's 81. Trump's 77. So Trumps too old as well.
But there just aren't any Democrats other than Biden who stick out in a good way.
Half of Democrats are left leaning moderates. 40 or 50 years ago, they might have been socially liberal, economically conservatives who used to be common where I live. The other half are much more liberal. In general, both sides of the party want the same thing but want different methods to get there.
The problem is how to appeal to both. Both Obama and Clinton are superb speakers. At their best, they are very inspiring. But when they ran, they really didn't say much about what they planned to do. They ended up using a mixture of moderate and liberal ideas. But many more people on the left want everything their way. You're either perfect or garbage. Nobody can be perfect for everyone.
The reason that Biden's numbers are low is inflation and relentless attacks from the right. Flat out lies are common.
|
|
|
Post by Garak Nephew on Nov 29, 2023 14:16:41 GMT
Biden is a weak candidate to face the threat of the void that represent Trump. Even with his relative success on the economy, Biden remains too status-quo to face the monsters of totalitarianism that lurks on the other side of the aisle. Miller, Bannon, MTG are not nice people, and they would eagerly burn to the ground what's left of democratic institutions in this country. I think that with this panorama it is a mistake to send billions of dollars on military aid to Israel and Ukraine. I keep hearing that Biden might already lost the Arab-American vote block which amount to a couple of millions votes; and I don't blame them with the images of the slaughter that is going on in Gaza. Republicans are gaining on Latinos and Democrat politicians keep playing the center game when they should be moving more clearly away from it.
|
|
|
Post by scenario on Nov 29, 2023 18:42:09 GMT
Its a matter of competing sets of morality. Letting two democracies die because they are inconvenient is not right.
There is no easy answer in Israel. Hamas is the government of the Palestinians. It launched missiles at Israel then sent troops over the border to kill and kidnap indiscriminately. 1200 Israeli people dead. Then the went back and hid within the population. The Israeli far right wing government acted just the way they said they would, brutally. This fight has been going on for generations and both sides believe that god is on their side. Once god enters a war, there is no morality. The U.S. under the Republican's would act exactly the same way if Mexico did the same thing.
We could just abandon Israel but then we have a country under siege with a far right wing government in charge which has nuclear weapons in its arsenal. They won't hesitate to use them because god is on their side.
Biden is stuck. He has to negotiate.
The Ukraine is being attacked by Russia. This is really a war between The U.S. and Russia with no Americans dying. Russia's economy is smaller than California's. The war is bankrupting them. The people saying we just have to abandon the Ukraine are the new Neville Chamberlains.
The Republicans are the far right enemy from within. You can't win by appeasement. Hopefully a firebrand will emerge from the Democrats who will openly attack the Republicans. Biden is trying to work with Republicans which won't work with people like Trump or MTG. But he can't just abandon his values to try to appease them. He'd be a good president with sane opposition. Not great but good.
|
|
|
Post by scenario on Dec 1, 2023 17:56:32 GMT
The house voted to expel Rep George Santos. Santos committed massive fraud to get elected. He openly bragged about it. The Republican leadership was against expelling him because, "We don't want to set a precedent." So they don't want to throw out someone just because he's a criminal. These are the people against Biden. They have a seriously different set of values then most American's do.
|
|
|
Post by Yorick on Dec 5, 2023 18:57:29 GMT
The view from a distant, interested party is unsettling. This seems to be case of undermining democracy in order to save it. It will have the opposite effect on Biden’s success than the one intended.
|
|
|
Post by SherlockHolmes on Dec 12, 2023 20:29:11 GMT
We need someone like President Lonestar Whitmore.
WE WILL NOT GO QUIETLY INTO THE NIGHT, WE WILL NOT VANISH WITHOUT A FIGHT. WE'RE GONG TO LIVE ON. WE'RE GOING TO SURVIVE. TODAY, WE CELEBRATE- OUR INDEPENDENCE DAY!!!
Someone with that conviction could win the hearts of the people.
|
|
|
Post by nombrecomun on Dec 13, 2023 0:40:42 GMT
We need someone like President Lonestar Whitmore. WE WILL NOT GO QUIETLY INTO THE NIGHT, WE WILL NOT VANISH WITHOUT A FIGHT. WE'RE GONG TO LIVE ON. WE'RE GOING TO SURVIVE. TODAY, WE CELEBRATE- OUR INDEPENDENCE DAY!!! Someone with that conviction could win the hearts of the people. That level of energy is not Biden. A decade ago yes....but he's just too old to do that.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Dec 15, 2023 21:02:53 GMT
The choices are going to be Biden or Trump. As such, there is no choice, not that I have huge misgivings about Biden.
If it makes anyone feel any better, this is going to be the last election of the generation.
|
|
|
Post by nombrecomun on Dec 16, 2023 1:41:18 GMT
The choices are going to be Biden or Trump. As such, there is no choice, not that I have huge misgivings about Biden. If it makes anyone feel any better, this is going to be the last election of the generation. I generally don't have a problem with Biden either but the optics aren't great. Do you mean the last election of which that old generation are the choices? If so, I agree. I think next election will have younger candidates. At least younger compared to this geriatric roster.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Dec 16, 2023 3:39:42 GMT
The choices are going to be Biden or Trump. As such, there is no choice, not that I have huge misgivings about Biden. If it makes anyone feel any better, this is going to be the last election of the generation. I generally don't have a problem with Biden either but the optics aren't great. Do you mean the last election of which that old generation are the choices? If so, I agree. I think next election will have younger candidates. At least younger compared to this geriatric roster. Yeah. The first of the Boomers are pretty officially too old to run at this point. Biden will be the last, at least for the Democrats. And, unless there's some sort of seismic shift between now and '28, I'm calling Newsom the presumptive Democratic nominee.
|
|
|
Post by nombrecomun on Dec 16, 2023 18:01:22 GMT
And, unless there's some sort of seismic shift between now and '28, I'm calling Newsom the presumptive Democratic nominee. He's practically running already which I think is smart if something were to happen to Biden from here to next year. Given his age....
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Dec 16, 2023 20:28:42 GMT
And, unless there's some sort of seismic shift between now and '28, I'm calling Newsom the presumptive Democratic nominee. He's practically running already which I think is smart if something were to happen to Biden from here to next year. Given his age.... Yeah. I have no problems with Harris or her politics, but, if something happens to Biden, the only GOP candidate she could beat is Trump. And I don't have enough confidence that she could do it to want her to be the nominee.
|
|
|
Post by Garak Nephew on Dec 17, 2023 17:18:09 GMT
I keep hearing from different sources that Biden is not going to be the Democrat candidate. Cornell West said that at some point on the first quarter of 2024, Biden "will pulled an LBJ"; alluding of course to (1968) Johnson deciding not to run for reelection due a combination of health concerns and to falling out of grace among the Democrat party and polls. Biden is not a bad president, but we need someone more aggressive and vital to fight the threat of the abyss Republicans represents now.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Dec 17, 2023 20:06:28 GMT
I keep hearing from different sources that Biden is not going to be the Democrat candidate. Cornell West said that at some point on the first quarter of 2024, Biden "will pulled an LBJ"; alluding of course to (1968) Johnson deciding not to run for reelection due a combination of health concerns and to falling out of grace among the Democrat party and polls. Biden is not a bad president, but we need someone more aggressive and vital to fight the threat of the abyss Republicans represents now. Cornell West is not a reliable source on much of anything. Also, the Democratic base seems solidly behind Biden at this point, and, if he were going to bow out, he's almost completely out of time to do it. If he were going to bow out, it'd have to be before the primaries begin in order to avoid complete bedlam.
|
|
|
Post by nombrecomun on Dec 17, 2023 22:38:14 GMT
I keep hearing from different sources that Biden is not going to be the Democrat candidate. Cornell West said that at some point on the first quarter of 2024, Biden "will pulled an LBJ"; alluding of course to (1968) Johnson deciding not to run for reelection due a combination of health concerns and to falling out of grace among the Democrat party and polls. Biden is not a bad president, but we need someone more aggressive and vital to fight the threat of the abyss Republicans represents now. Cornell West is not a reliable source on much of anything. Also, the Democratic base seems solidly behind Biden at this point, and, if he were going to bow out, he's almost completely out of time to do it. If he were going to bow out, it'd have to be before the primaries begin in order to avoid complete bedlam. For sure, West isn't reliable. He's a candidate himself of sorts. But I wouldn't dismiss the anxiety Dems feel about Biden at this point. Many, including myself, thought he would be sort of a pause to the Trump insanity, and that he would eventually bow out paving the way to a younger more suitable candidate. Now, if you mean by 'solidly behind him' to mean that of course we're gonna vote for him...sure. But I wonder how many people have doubts and how many won't vote for him similar to what happened to Hillary.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Dec 18, 2023 0:53:58 GMT
Cornell West is not a reliable source on much of anything. Also, the Democratic base seems solidly behind Biden at this point, and, if he were going to bow out, he's almost completely out of time to do it. If he were going to bow out, it'd have to be before the primaries begin in order to avoid complete bedlam. For sure, West isn't reliable. He's a candidate himself of sorts. But I wouldn't dismiss the anxiety Dems feel about Biden at this point. Many, including myself, thought he would be sort of a pause to the Trump insanity, and that he would eventually bow out paving the way to a younger more suitable candidate. Now, if you mean by 'solidly behind him' to mean that of course we're gonna vote for him...sure. But I wonder how many people have doubts and how many won't vote for him similar to what happened to Hillary. They're solidly behind him in that no one's even talking about a serious challenge to Biden for the nomination. No one that has a chance of wresting the nomination from him has uttered a peep. Trump's got the nomination sewn and we're still going through the performative nonsense. Aside from that, Democrats seem to comprehend that, historically, regardless, of party, primaries of incumbents do nothing to help the incumbent in the General and do nothing to help the guy that wins the slot if he wins it from the incumbent. As with Hillary, the people looking for reasons not to vote for the Democrat won't. Biden's age, or, "I consider myself a liberal, but not a "California" liberal, so I just can't with that guy." The biggest concern I have at this point isn't Biden. Liz Cheney has been rumbling about running to "stop Trump" for a while. If she mounts some (I) run in the general? Republicans hate her guts. She's not going to bleed votes from them or right-leaning (I)s.
|
|
|
Post by nombrecomun on Dec 18, 2023 2:33:08 GMT
The biggest concern I have at this point isn't Biden. Liz Cheney has been rumbling about running to "stop Trump" for a while. If she mounts some (I) run in the general? Republicans hate her guts. She's not going to bleed votes from them or right-leaning (I)s. I don't see her doing that for exactly the reason you postulate. I think she's smart enough to realize her own party hates her and that she would only hurt Democrats by doing that. I tend to think Chris Christie is doing that job. I don't think his candidacy is genuine. He's doing it to bring the horrors of a second Trump to light among his crowd...or former crowd.
|
|
|
Post by Yorick on Dec 18, 2023 20:24:18 GMT
For sure, West isn't reliable. He's a candidate himself of sorts. But I wouldn't dismiss the anxiety Dems feel about Biden at this point. Many, including myself, thought he would be sort of a pause to the Trump insanity, and that he would eventually bow out paving the way to a younger more suitable candidate. Now, if you mean by 'solidly behind him' to mean that of course we're gonna vote for him...sure. But I wonder how many people have doubts and how many won't vote for him similar to what happened to Hillary. They're solidly behind him in that no one's even talking about a serious challenge to Biden for the nomination. No one that has a chance of wresting the nomination from him has uttered a peep. Trump's got the nomination sewn and we're still going through the performative nonsense. Aside from that, Democrats seem to comprehend that, historically, regardless, of party, primaries of incumbents do nothing to help the incumbent in the General and do nothing to help the guy that wins the slot if he wins it from the incumbent. As with Hillary, the people looking for reasons not to vote for the Democrat won't. Biden's age, or, "I consider myself a liberal, but not a "California" liberal, so I just can't with that guy." The biggest concern I have at this point isn't Biden. Liz Cheney has been rumbling about running to "stop Trump" for a while. If she mounts some (I) run in the general? Republicans hate her guts. She's not going to bleed votes from them or right-leaning (I)s. From watching alternative media from the US, there are lots of challengers to Biden who have been peeping their lungs out. The lack of a “serious challenger” might be a self-fulfilling prophesy as large media outlets ignore them as non-serious, thereby blanketing them from the majority of voters. Even under these circumstances, Marianne Williamson is at about 12%, which is on a par with the “serious challenger” Haley. Sure, Haley can’t secure the nomination with Trump in the game but she gets plenty of attention. The Democrats won’t even put Haley, Phillips or Uygur (noting the complications for him) on a primary ballot.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Dec 18, 2023 21:56:24 GMT
They're solidly behind him in that no one's even talking about a serious challenge to Biden for the nomination. No one that has a chance of wresting the nomination from him has uttered a peep. Trump's got the nomination sewn and we're still going through the performative nonsense. Aside from that, Democrats seem to comprehend that, historically, regardless, of party, primaries of incumbents do nothing to help the incumbent in the General and do nothing to help the guy that wins the slot if he wins it from the incumbent. As with Hillary, the people looking for reasons not to vote for the Democrat won't. Biden's age, or, "I consider myself a liberal, but not a "California" liberal, so I just can't with that guy." The biggest concern I have at this point isn't Biden. Liz Cheney has been rumbling about running to "stop Trump" for a while. If she mounts some (I) run in the general? Republicans hate her guts. She's not going to bleed votes from them or right-leaning (I)s. From watching alternative media from the US, there are lots of challengers to Biden who have been peeping their lungs out. The lack of a “serious challenger” might be a self-fulfilling prophesy as large media outlets ignore them as non-serious, thereby blanketing them from the majority of voters. Even under these circumstances, Marianne Williamson is at about 12%, which is on a par with the “serious challenger” Haley. Sure, Haley can’t secure the nomination with Trump in the game but she gets plenty of attention. The Democrats won’t even put Haley, Phillips or Uygur (noting the complications for him) on a primary ballot. There are no serious challengers. www.politico.com/news/2023/05/29/marianne-williamsons-campaign-against-the-world-00099043Polling at 9% is not anything like a serious challenge. Saying you're running is not the same as making a dent in the nominating process. They won't put these names on the ballot because, again, D or R, challenging an incumbent trashes the parties' odds in the General Election, even if they somehow manage to wrest the nomination from the incumbent. Both parties know this. Also, Uygur doesn't have "complications" associated with him running. He is prohibited from the office by the Constitution. This is his argument--and his argument debunked: checkyourfact.com/2023/10/16/uygur-president-experts-constitution/
|
|
|
Post by Yorick on Dec 19, 2023 10:28:44 GMT
From watching alternative media from the US, there are lots of challengers to Biden who have been peeping their lungs out. The lack of a “serious challenger” might be a self-fulfilling prophesy as large media outlets ignore them as non-serious, thereby blanketing them from the majority of voters. Even under these circumstances, Marianne Williamson is at about 12%, which is on a par with the “serious challenger” Haley. Sure, Haley can’t secure the nomination with Trump in the game but she gets plenty of attention. The Democrats won’t even put Haley, Phillips or Uygur (noting the complications for him) on a primary ballot. There are no serious challengers. www.politico.com/news/2023/05/29/marianne-williamsons-campaign-against-the-world-00099043Polling at 9% is not anything like a serious challenge. Saying you're running is not the same as making a dent in the nominating process. They won't put these names on the ballot because, again, D or R, challenging an incumbent trashes the parties' odds in the General Election, even if they somehow manage to wrest the nomination from the incumbent. Both parties know this. Also, Uygur doesn't have "complications" associated with him running. He is prohibited from the office by the Constitution. This is his argument--and his argument debunked: checkyourfact.com/2023/10/16/uygur-president-experts-constitution/ I hear you, but keeping them off the ballot does its own kind of damage. I’m worried that Biden doesn’t know how to campaign. Trump does. When it comes to governing, that’s another matter. A helluva year coming up. Re. Cenk: I wish him luck. That’s an aspect of the US Constitution that should be changed.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Dec 19, 2023 17:47:14 GMT
I hear you, but keeping them off the ballot does its own kind of damage. I’m worried that Biden doesn’t know how to campaign. Trump does. When it comes to governing, that’s another matter. A helluva year coming up. Re. Cenk: I wish him luck. That’s an aspect of the US Constitution that should be changed. Biden is not on the ballot in New Hampshire in '24, due to a delegate issue. The national party has chosen South Carolina as the first primary state. However, New Hampshire has a state law that says they have to go first. This is nonsense to me because it's a state law and state law doesn't have any impact on the national organization. The DNC can choose its primary schedule as it pleases. But it is the nonsense that it is... Biden has declined to appear on the NH primary ballot because of the tangle.. No one is keeping anyone off the ballot. Basically, all you have to do in most states is pay the filing fee, then convince people to vote for you. There are 21 names on the NH ballot. Biden, Williamson, and Dean Phillips will appear on the SC ballot, so there are options if people want them. Cenk doesn't appear on either, being disqualified from appearing for not being a natural born citizen. And, actually, no, I would NOT want the Constitution amended so that a naturalized US citizen can run for President.... ....not while Elon Musk is alive anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Yorick on Dec 19, 2023 21:09:35 GMT
I hear you, but keeping them off the ballot does its own kind of damage. I’m worried that Biden doesn’t know how to campaign. Trump does. When it comes to governing, that’s another matter. A helluva year coming up. Re. Cenk: I wish him luck. That’s an aspect of the US Constitution that should be changed. Biden is not on the ballot in New Hampshire in '24, due to a delegate issue. The national party has chosen South Carolina as the first primary state. However, New Hampshire has a state law that says they have to go first. This is nonsense to me because it's a state law and state law doesn't have any impact on the national organization. The DNC can choose its primary schedule as it pleases. But it is the nonsense that it is... Biden has declined to appear on the NH primary ballot because of the tangle.. No one is keeping anyone off the ballot. Basically, all you have to do in most states is pay the filing fee, then convince people to vote for you. There are 21 names on the NH ballot. Biden, Williamson, and Dean Phillips will appear on the SC ballot, so there are options if people want them. Cenk doesn't appear on either, being disqualified from appearing for not being a natural born citizen. And, actually, no, I would NOT want the Constitution amended so that a naturalized US citizen can run for President.... ....not while Elon Musk is alive anyway. Ha! Good point, but alas, Trump himself trumps the Musk counter argument, methinks. There must be a cohort of naturalised citizens who would make better candidates than some natural-born citizens. Also, help me understand this re. appearing on ballots for the primary. thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4338390-democratic-long-shots-blast-florida-democrats-for-their-absence-on-primary-ballot/There are many wannabe Trumps on the fringes of Au politics who so far are marginal. The mechanics of US political success is compelling as it a shadow play of our political future. From here, Biden seems in real trouble against Trump and - if the letters and commentary of the Sydney Morning Herald are a guide - quite baffling. Hence my interest, and foreboding! Cheers.
|
|
|
Post by scenario on Dec 20, 2023 0:39:29 GMT
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Trump is ineligible to be president because of the constitution's clause about insurrection.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Dec 20, 2023 1:14:12 GMT
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Trump is ineligible to be president because of the constitution's clause about insurrection. This actually doesn't surprise me. Colorado had the strongest case. and, the District judge states in her opinion that, in fact, he DID commit Insurrection under the 14th Amendment, but wouldn't rule that he should be reoved. I think just because she didn't wanna get shot or have her house firebombed.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Dec 20, 2023 1:18:52 GMT
Biden is not on the ballot in New Hampshire in '24, due to a delegate issue. The national party has chosen South Carolina as the first primary state. However, New Hampshire has a state law that says they have to go first. This is nonsense to me because it's a state law and state law doesn't have any impact on the national organization. The DNC can choose its primary schedule as it pleases. But it is the nonsense that it is... Biden has declined to appear on the NH primary ballot because of the tangle.. No one is keeping anyone off the ballot. Basically, all you have to do in most states is pay the filing fee, then convince people to vote for you. There are 21 names on the NH ballot. Biden, Williamson, and Dean Phillips will appear on the SC ballot, so there are options if people want them. Cenk doesn't appear on either, being disqualified from appearing for not being a natural born citizen. And, actually, no, I would NOT want the Constitution amended so that a naturalized US citizen can run for President.... ....not while Elon Musk is alive anyway. Ha! Good point, but alas, Trump himself trumps the Musk counter argument, methinks. There must be a cohort of naturalised citizens who would make better candidates than some natural-born citizens. Also, help me understand this re. appearing on ballots for the primary. thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4338390-democratic-long-shots-blast-florida-democrats-for-their-absence-on-primary-ballot/There are many wannabe Trumps on the fringes of Au politics who so far are marginal. The mechanics of US political success is compelling as it a shadow play of our political future. From here, Biden seems in real trouble against Trump and - if the letters and commentary of the Sydney Morning Herald are a guide - quite baffling. Hence my interest, and foreboding! Cheers. I don't really understand it at this point because the article doesn't state why Williamson didn't appear. I'd have to dig some more. Why Cenk didn't appear is already clear.
|
|
|
Post by nombrecomun on Dec 20, 2023 4:34:30 GMT
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Trump is ineligible to be president because of the constitution's clause about insurrection. This actually doesn't surprise me. Colorado had the strongest case. and, the District judge states in her opinion that, in fact, he DID commit Insurrection under the 14th Amendment, but wouldn't rule that he should be reoved. I think just because she didn't wanna get shot or have her house firebombed.And that's where we're at sadly.
|
|
|
Post by Yorick on Dec 21, 2023 19:37:50 GMT
Ha! Good point, but alas, Trump himself trumps the Musk counter argument, methinks. There must be a cohort of naturalised citizens who would make better candidates than some natural-born citizens. Also, help me understand this re. appearing on ballots for the primary. thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4338390-democratic-long-shots-blast-florida-democrats-for-their-absence-on-primary-ballot/There are many wannabe Trumps on the fringes of Au politics who so far are marginal. The mechanics of US political success is compelling as it a shadow play of our political future. From here, Biden seems in real trouble against Trump and - if the letters and commentary of the Sydney Morning Herald are a guide - quite baffling. Hence my interest, and foreboding! Cheers. I don't really understand it at this point because the article doesn't state why Williamson didn't appear. I'd have to dig some more. Why Cenk didn't appear is already clear. It seems to be simply because the DNC doesn’t want it. The (true) argument that Trump is a threat to democracy rings hollow when the DNC fails to engage its its own democratic processes, ignoring its own rules. I understand how a strong united front for Biden helps him, but if there are challengers with statistically significant followings being ignored, the risk is what happens to these vital votes on election day. Yes, they should vote Biden but human nature being what it is… This from today:
|
|