|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 20, 2023 14:50:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nombrecomun on Mar 21, 2023 0:39:29 GMT
Well....I suppose that's cool. But I tend to think, even as popular as they were back in the day, the TNG characters and everyone else that followed aren't as iconic as the TOS crew. Shatner is still around and there have already been 2 versions of Kirk.
I just can't see anyone caring much about Riker, Worf, etc...20 years down the road.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 21, 2023 0:50:44 GMT
Well....I suppose that's cool. But I tend to think, even as popular as they were back in the day, the TNG characters and everyone else that followed aren't as iconic as the TOS crew. Shatner is still around and there have already been 2 versions of Kirk. I just can't see anyone caring much about Riker, Worf, etc...20 years down the road. That's the thing for me: Picard is iconic and so, maybe that's enough to try someday, but in, say, 2030, it's not going to be recognizable in any way compared to TNG '87.
|
|
|
Post by Yorick on Mar 22, 2023 18:19:33 GMT
“How many ages hence / Shall this our lofty scene be acted over / In states unborn and accents yet unknown!”
Interesting to consider the potential deep legacy of Star Trek. I am reminded of a scene in the movie Time After Time where a time-travelling HG Wells assumes the false name Sherlock Holmes when arrested in 1979, thinking that by that far future time this popular Victorian character would have been forgotten.
Also, recasting may not be needed. The descendants of Dall e and Midjourney will be able to generate new, visually perfect episodes from new scripts written by writers both human and algorithmic.
New Star Trek starring Shatner, Nimoy, Frakes, Stewart et al. Artistic dystopia? Or— something else…
Just some early morning (Au) ramblings from someone whose profession is on the line in the upcoming state election.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus59650 on Mar 22, 2023 18:25:06 GMT
Artistic dystopia, IMHO.
I don't want some AI generating a Humphrey Bogart, Mel Gibson spy movie.
Or a "new" Pirates of the Caribbean movie with dead Johnny Depp and Erroll Flynn.
It feels...borderline necrophiliac.
|
|
|
Post by Sehlat Vie on Mar 23, 2023 0:15:33 GMT
Well....I suppose that's cool. But I tend to think, even as popular as they were back in the day, the TNG characters and everyone else that followed aren't as iconic as the TOS crew. Shatner is still around and there have already been 2 versions of Kirk. I just can't see anyone caring much about Riker, Worf, etc...20 years down the road. That's the thing for me: Picard is iconic and so, maybe that's enough to try someday, but in, say, 2030, it's not going to be recognizable in any way compared to TNG '87. Better to just make a new show then to recast characters from a spinoff show. That's feels vaguely like a copy of a copy. Eventually, you recast too much and wind up with Kirk-Lite (SNW's Kirk-in-name-only).
|
|